Gary Byrne is the Indiana state senator from… Byrneville?
Really?
…Sure.
This week, he made moves to remove “Consent” from the Sex Education curriculum of Indiana schools. He has reconsidered this, amid huge and well deserved backlash, but he did make the suggestion, and I think it deserves some discussion.
After all this has been the issue that is likely going to define his political career. His only other major accomplishment in the Indiana State Legislature has been trying to ban public transit from offering free or reduced fare rides on election days.
Classy guy.
Here’s the thing: It seems to me, and the nationwide backlash that forced him to reconsider, that the only reason you would object to consent being the standard of sex education in your state, would be if you’re in favor of more rape.
So: what exactly is wrong with Gary Byrne?
Why introduce a proposal where the only possible result is more sexual assault and rapes in Indiana?
Why would you disapprove of teaching a young person that if someone is doing something you don’t like, you can and should say “No” and that “no” should be respected? Why would you have objections to teaching people that no does in fact mean no, and is not to be ignored or taken to mean “try harder”?
Without consent as part of sex education, these things will happen. Removing consent means more sexual assault and rape. Period
That should be obvious to anyone; so what’s wrong with Gary Byrne?
Giving Gary the most generous benefit of the doubt (and given what Gary’s party is up to these days, that’s quite the allowance) the best case scenario is that this is an exercise in willful ignorance.
I think Mr. Byrne and his party don’t wanna talk about sex.
There are many reasons for this. Some have religious objections to sex as something sinful and dirty that shouldn’t be mentioned in public. Many have overtly gross outdated ideas of sex, or even grosser modern “red-pilled” ideas. Maybe a few are just worried they’ll pop a boner in public and die of embarrassment.
Who’s to say?
Whatever the reason, educating children and young adults about sex and how to be safe is not the issue in the minds of Gary and his friends. The issue is the discussion itself.
So, Mr. Byrne might say to himself, if the discussion is the problem: stop the discussion.
Problem solved, right?
No. Of course not, because that’s not how anything works here in the real world.
But this is emblematic of Republican and conservative thinking on major social issues.
Explicitly so even.
How often have we heard the argument that racism isn’t a problem in America, people claiming racism is a problem are though.
I know I’ve heard the phrase “If people would stop talking so much about racism the problem would disappear” at least a dozen times this past decade from conservative pundits and talking heads.
It’s obviously ridiculous. Racism isn’t Beetlejuice, it isn’t magically conjured when you say its name.
But to one party in this country, racism isn’t a problem, the discussion about race is the problem. And so: problem=solved.
Queer rights and representation are the same. Ban the gay books, don’t tell us your pronouns, and definitely don’t say gay!
We don’t have to fix any of our issues as a society if we just ignore them and never speak of them… right?
This is childish.
A policy made by adult babies without object permanence.
And that’s the generous interpretation of this move.
So Gary Byrne, I’d like to know: is it that you’re Pro-Rape, or do you just have the problem solving skills of a toddler?
I’m curious.